​​​​The Growth of New IndustriesMove of the Mill Owners | Middle-Class Mill Managers | Darwen Millowners 
Local Politics | Eccles Shorrock | Cotton Men | The Lewis Brothers Textiles Company and Thomas Boys Lewis
William Whaley, the Slave Trader from Blackburn

 
 
The growth of new industries in the towns of east Lancashire transformed the landscape and environment, turned the local economy upside down, and drastically altered the character of each place which was affected. But industrial development (and especially the arrival and eventual dominance of cotton) had another important consequence - it reshaped the social structure of every town, making some people wealthy, creating an entirely new middle class, and vastly increasing the size and numerical importance of the working classes. Places such as Blackburn had been country market towns and stayed as such until the 1780s. Then, within half a century ( the lifetime of one individual) they became the workshops of the world. Some of the towns were much newer. While Blackburn had been a significant market town for five hundred years, Darwen was only a village in the later 18th century, but by 1861 it was a town of over 20,000 people. As in all places in any part of the world where an economic and commercial boom suddenly arrives, and where industries and towns grow overnight like mushrooms, fortunes were made and people who were once ordinary citizens suddenly became prominent, powerful, influential and ostentatious.
This change is essential to any understanding of what life was like in the cotton towns. The self-made men had the surplus cash to buy their way into society, politics and local affairs. People respected them but at the same time there were jealousies and rivalries, and some fellow-townsmen who had not made the grade felt embittered and discontented. The leading merchants were not only associated with cotton - in each town there were other industries which also enriched certain individuals - but the eventual dominance of cotton ensured that the millowners were prominent. In Darwen, a smaller town than Blackburn and one which had grown up very rapidly, the cotton interest was especially strong because, in a very real sense, cotton made the town itself. There were papermills and collieries, but nothing could rival the importance of the cotton mills which in 1921 employed almost 56 per cent of the town's workforce.
 
By Dr. Alan Crosby
 
 
 

 Move of the Mill Ow​ners

 
The millowners and their families, once they had made sufficient money, invariably chose to move out of town. Most had lived originally in centrally-situated town houses, with small gardens (or none at all) but they now preferred to live on the edge of town, or beyond in a country house. The most successful set themselves up in the style of county gentry. In the case of Blackburn the first really wealthy cotton man was Henry Sudell, who was born in the town in 1764 and in 1797 moved out to the great newly-built mansion of Woodfold, set in a large landscaped park. From this he could drive, with his flamboyantly painted coach drawn by fine horses, into Blackburn whenever business (political, social or commercial) beckoned. His spectacular bankruptcy in 1827, in the aftermath of a cotton slump and ill-judged financial dealings, must have been seen as fair retribution by at least some of his Blackburn contemporaries.
 
By Dr. Alan Crosby
 

Middle-Class Mill Managers 

On a more modest scale, but perhaps no less important in the long run, were the many middle-class cotton managers and minor owners who in mid to late 19th century Blackburn moved from the heart of the old town up the slopes to Revidge, Billinge and Beardwood, creating a fashionable and exclusive new suburb of large and opulent family houses set in wooded grounds and leafy streets. The hill location was not only attractive but also upwind of the increasingly serious problem of smoke from a hundred mills and their belching chimneys. What geographers call the social segregation of the different classes ' their residence in distinct parts of the town' was thus emphasised. The millworkers lived down in the valley and off to the east, the owners and managers were physically, as well as socially, in an elevated position to the west. They were not alone, for another consequence of the growth of a middle class of managers and industrialists was the increasing importance of the professions which served them - the lawyers and solicitors, doctors, accountants, and architects - and the owners or top managers of the shops, private schools and banks which they patronised. These groups, too, moved westwards up the slopes of Preston New Road.
 
Dr. Alan Crosby
 
 
 

Darwen Millow​​ners 

 
Darwen also had its exclusive suburb, though here the circumstances were rather less favourable. As a considerably smaller town, with fewer mills than Blackburn, and thus fewer mill-owning families or managers, there was never going to be development on the scale of Blackburn's western suburbs. But Darwen also had a lower percentage of professionals (doctors, lawyers and accountants) because it was a more workaday place than its larger neighbour. There was another disadvantage: in Revidge and Beardwood the top of the ridge on which the new suburbs grew was about 500-600 feet above sea level, but the south-west end of Darwen, upwind of the mills and collieries and enjoying fine views down the valley, was at 800-900 feet, markedly more exposed and chilly. Nonetheless, by 1900 there had developed in the Bury Fold and Whitehall area a residential suburb with splendid stone-built houses, standing in large wooded grounds alongside the rushing streams which came down off the moor. With names such as Spring Bank, Briarwood, Woodlands, Ashdale and Heatherby, so beloved of prosperous late Victorian people who had made their way in the world, these houses typified the success of at least one sector of Darwen, and indeed of Lancashire, society in that golden age of local industry.
 
Dr. Alan Crosby
 
 
 

 Local Polit​ics

 
The newly-prosperous classes in town society sought to achieve other goals. They were able to exploit their wealth and status to carve out positions in local and national politics. The first mayor of the new borough of Blackburn, granted its charter by Queen Victoria in 1851, was William Henry Hornby, the cotton owner, who was also the largest employer of labour in the town. William Feilden, another man whose fortune was heavily dependent on cotton (though he had many and varied business and commercial interests) was one of the town's first two MPs after it had been given parliamentary representation in 1832. The other was William Turner - he, too, had made his money in cotton. By the 1860s the borough council was dominated by men who had risen from relative obscurity to high local prominence through their industrial enterprises. Merchants and millowners ruled the town directly as councillors and indirectly as the leaders of social life and the employers of labour. Darwen, which acquired its local government body, the Over Darwen Local Board, in 1854, became a borough in 1878. The cotton men played a very prominent part in petitioning the Queen to grant a charter, and an equally prominent part in running the town thereafter. Typical were Alexander Carus, who owned St Paul's Mill at Hoddlesden, and who in1889 was 'a Justice of the Peace for Darwen, and occupying as he does such a prominent and influential position in social and mercantile circles - is well known and highly esteemed for his active exertions in promoting the best interests of the commerce and manufactures of Darwen and district, and the physical and moral welfare of the industrial community'. In the same year the Gillibrand brothers, owners of Hollin Grove Mill, were 'both magistrates for the borough of Darwen, and J.W. Gillibrand is also a member of the Darwen Town Council'.
 
by Dr. Alan Crosby
 
 

 


 
 

 Eccles Shorr​ock

 
Eccles Shorrock was the mastermind behind India Mill. He was the second of three generations bearing that name. He was the nephew of the first Eccles Shorrock, a founding Darwen mill owner. Eccles Shorrock Ashton was born in 1827 in Clitheroe. He dropped the Ashton when he was adopted by his uncle. He later had a son, the third Eccles Shorrock.
It was the second Eccles Shorrock who left his mark on the town, whose memorial is India Mill Chimney, a landmark that dominates the town just as much today as it did 140 years ago when it was built.
 
 
 
 

Cotton Me​n 

Similar flattering descriptions - these come from a local trade directory - could be found for virtually all the 'cotton men', whether owners or managers. The former were of course the most influential, for in their hands was the wellbeing of the entire community - the closure of a mill or the bankruptcy of a textile business could mean hundreds being thrown out of work with no means of support. The managers, in charge of the more day-to-day operations in each mill, were no less powerful in other ways, every decision they made affecting the daily lives of the workers and their families. Managers were rewarded by high salaries and became men of status and prestige in their own right, moving to the suburbs, joining the town council, sponsoring local charities, sitting in the best pews at church or chapel. Their influence was pervasive. They were the top men, they and their families formed the most superior circle in local society, their houses were the finest in the town, and their status demanded and commanded respect and deference from the people below them in wealth and position.
 

by Dr. Alan Crosby
 

The Lewis Brothers Textiles Company and Thomas Boys Lewis​​

John Lewis (1794-1852) was born and raised in the Welsh town of Bangor-On-Dee in Flintshire, where his father James and the family operated as maltsters and brewers, with a series of kilns across the area. His grandfather (also John) was considered ‘well to do’ by locals, so he and the family obviously had money. John Lewis moved to London in 1810, where, according to later accounts, he apprenticed in the grocery trade.  
Thomas Boys Lewis (1869-1942), wrote a poem about his grandfather’s time in the capital, which gives us some useful research clues:

‘The Welsh Apprentice in London, 1810’
My grandsire’s barges float
The corn down to the sea;
They make it to the shires
From Bangor on the Dee

At counter all day long
I serve the rice and tea
to strangers, but I think of
Bangor on the Dee.

In dreams I walk the fields
Of Bangor on the Dee.

Between 1813 and 1817, a ‘Mr Lewis’ was reported in newspapers acting as a London grocer and as ‘grocer & tea dealer’, which explains the reference to ‘serving…tea all day’. During this period, his business address changed several times, all locations within the same few hundred square yards of central London – so it is possible that he was operating from a stall. The poem also raises questions about exactly what kind of commerce his family were involved in – particularly the line about his grandfather’s barges moving corn through the River Dee to the coast. In the eighteenth century, the Dee was a very busy route for transporting goods both around the UK and internationally. Although the Dee’s shallows made it more difficult to navigate than the Mersey, smaller, flat-bottomed boats (like barges) used the river to move considerable amounts of lead, iron, coal, cheese, corn, bricks, beer and timber. So, from the poem, it seems likely that alongside the brewery business, the Lewis family were shipping goods using the river from Bangor-On-Dee, and through the then busy port of Chester. This would have brought considerable wealth to back a young John Lewis when he set up business, first in London and then Blackburn.

By April 1817, John Lewis was reported as a ‘Blackburn resident’, when he married Mary Stones in the town. There’s no obvious reason why a Welsh grocer, who served his time in London, might move to Blackburn, other than by that point, the town’s textile manufacturing was growing rapidly, and probably offered opportunities to a budding businessman. Although listed as ‘grocer’ in directories of the time, Lewis developed a large wholesale food business (one of the first in the area) alongside retail stores, also purchasing several buildings in the town centre. So, he was either a very successful businessman, had family money to invest - or perhaps both. Mary and John Lewis had three daughters, Elizabeth (1822-1831), Mary (1827-1828) and Mary Anne (1828-1850) along with five sons: James (1818-1887), George (1819-1892), Thomas (1820-1884), John (1825-1906) and William (1830-1873). The boys attended Blackburn Grammar School, some going on to study at university, and they then followed John into grocery - John junior becoming a pharmacist, with a shop based in buildings owned by his father.

The brothers considered entering the cotton trade as early as the 1840s, but were cautioned against it by their father, due to a slump caused by over-production. When John Lewis died in 1852, his sons James and Thomas built weaving sheds in Daisyfield, while also maintaining the grocery business, but this was sold in 1859, to fund the building of Springfield Mill, one of twelve then in construction, due to a manufacturing boom.  According to a later newspaper article, the company, which by then also included the other Lewis brothers, used only cotton imported from Egypt. However, as there are very few surviving records of Blackburn’s cotton industry from that era, it has not yet been possible to verify where their cotton was picked.  So, although the business was impacted by the American conflict, it was reportedly less affected than many others and was well-placed to cash-in on the boom after the conflict. It is though important to note that Egyptian cotton was, at that point, picked by a combination of enslaved people and ‘state-enforced-labour’; the trade in and use of the African commodity as tainted by humanitarian concerns as cotton from the southern US states.

Further developing the large stone-built mill in Daisyfield, the Lewis Bros increased both its size and output, then adding a second mill and employing a very sizeable workforce, bringing them status in Blackburn. Both Conservatives, Thomas and James became substantial donors to the party and were elected as councillors, taking positions of power in the town’s administration (Thomas later becoming a member of the committee which oversaw the running of the library and museum), and as governors of the Grammar School and Technical College. In August 1862, during the early part of the US Civil War, Thomas was reported as being on the platform at a Town Hall meeting at which Conservatives (including several other leading cotton manufacturers) tried to vote through a motion asking Queen Victoria to recognise the Confederacy as a separate sovereign state. Although the proposal was soundly beaten, this illustrates the split then developing in Blackburn - between those who supported the south (many, but not all Conservatives, most mill and landowners) and others who backed the northern states, from differing socio-economic backgrounds.

Thomas Lewis married Ann Boys (1823-1894) and together they had five daughters and two sons. This included Thomas Boys Lewis (1869-1942) who was sent to Eton, gained a first in Classics at Kings College Cambridge, and then taught at public school Malvern College. On the death of his uncle James in 1892, TB Lewis and his brother Henry (1857-1915) inherited his company shares and TB gave up teaching, to work in the cotton business – although he continued to tutor Greek and Latin in a voluntary capacity at Blackburn Technical College. He became a governor of Blackburn Grammar School, endowed a university scholarship to its best achieving pupil and paid for six stained-glass windows to be constructed in the hall.
A reputedly charismatic and charming Justice of the Peace and councillor, Henry Lewis spent much of his time dealing with public rather than company matters, so although Henry was notionally the head of the business, it was TB who spent more time focused on textiles. When Henry passed away in 1915, Thomas Boys took over the running of the textiles business, which had become a public limited company, selling his controlling shares in 1920. Alongside cotton manufacturing, TB Lewis took a wide interest in the arts, writing poetry (e.g. ‘The Cotton Manufacturer’s Lament’, 1921) and literature; in 1899 marrying the successful artist Hillary Coddington (1871-1936), whose paintings had been exhibited in London and New York. Lewis also developed a fascination for local history, in 1925 spending over £5,000 (£265,000 in today’s terms) of his own money, to purchase and pay for the restoration of the then dilapidated Samlesbury Hall. He also donated another £5,000 to the ‘Cathedral Fund’, which supported the development of the Bishopric of Blackburn. 
In 1934 Lewis opened a Textile Museum in Church Street, which contained working replicas of the main developments in cotton manufacturing. Its collections included early handlooms, the Spinning Jenny, the Mule and the Water Frame as well as related material, including a Blackburn Weavers banner. Since the closure of the original building in 2006, these exhibits have been housed at Blackburn Museum and Art Gallery.
The research on which this article is based, was commissioned by Blackburn Museum and Art Gallery.

Sources: 
Amelia Holt – The Blackburn Benefactor: Thomas Boys Lewis (1981)
Lancashire Archives: Land Conveyance 1873 – DDX 2668/42
Bill of Quantities PR 3081/4/48
Blackburn Directories
Newspapers and obituary cuttings held in the Local History Archives at Blackburn Central Library
Digitised Newspapers: The Blackburn Standard, The Preston Chronicle, The Preston Herald, The Blackburn Weekly Telegraph, Morning Post
Ancestry Website: www.Ancestry.co.uk
Find a Grave website: www.findagrave.com

Bruce Wilkinson, published February 2026.

William Whaley is known as one of Liverpool’s major slave traders during the second quarter of the eighteenth century. Having his own Wikipedia page is evidence of this (1).  However, little is known of his background. This article will show that even though he was a grocer in Liverpool, he came from the Whalley family from the Blackburn area. During the middle of the eighteenth century, Whaley became one of the most important investors in ships that carried enslaved African to the Americas. This trade in human lives made fortunes for many Liverpool merchants but, from Whaley’s will and that of his son who predeceased him, Whaley gained no lasting wealth from his involvement.

Abram included the Whalley family in his History of Blackburn but does not include William Whaley or his father, Ralph (2).  A document held by Lancashire Archives enables a positive identification of William and his father (3).  In this document William states that his father, Ralph Whaley of Blackburn, was the brother of John Whaley, also of Blackburn. Also, he states that his uncle was John Sharples, and his grandmother was Esther Sharples. This is misleading. John Whaley married Anne Sharples at Brindle on 6 September 1698. John Sharples was Anne’s brother, and Esther was mother of both Anne and John. William had no direct relation to either John or Esther Sharples but there was a family connection through his brother’s marriage. Abram did include John Whalley in his section on the Whalleys of Rishton, Blackburn, Sparth and Clerk-Hill (4).  This John Whalley is William’s uncle even though he has the extra l in his surname. John and Ralph’s father was Thomas Whalley of Sparth in Clayton-le-Moors. Abram lists several children of Thomas Whalley, but he did not include Ralph, but this receipt leaves no doubt he was Thomas Whalley’s son. William Whaley was of a family from the Blackburn area but as no record of his baptism has been found it is not certain he was born in Blackburn. Through marriage, Whaley had a further connection to Blackburn. In December 1722 he married Esther Baldwin at St Mary, Blackburn (5).  Esther was the daughter of William Baldwin who along with William Sudell and Henry Feilden purchased the secular moiety of the Manor of Blackburn in February 1722 (6).  Esther’s mother was sister of Anne, the wife of Whaley’s uncle, John. In 1752 the Whaley and Feilden families became linked when Esther and Whaley’s son, Ralph, married Catherine, daughter of Henry Feilden. Through family and marriage Whaley had connections to Blackburn.

By the time William entered his apprenticeship, he no longer lived in Blackburn, if he had ever lived there. In 1713, William was apprenticed as a grocer to Foster Cunliffe (1682-1758) of Liverpool (8).  There are several errors in Find My Past’s transcription of the apprenticeship record: his place of residence is given as Eccleston in Derbyshire, not Lancashire, and his father is given as Ral, not Ralph. William did have connections to Eccleston near Preston because he bequeathed property in Eccleston juxta Croston in his will.  Being apprenticed as a grocer prepared William for trading in large quantities of goods, particularly spices, preserved foods and from the early eighteenth-century tea, coffee and cocoa (9).  Foster Cunliffe prepared Whaley for a trade in high-class foodstuffs but he did not introduce him to the trade of enslaving African people. Although Foster Cunliffe was one of the earliest slave traders from Liverpool, the first record of Cunliffe’s involvement in the slave trade on www.slavevoyages.org was in 1719 just as Whaley finished his apprenticeship. Although not comprehensive, the data on the Slave Voyages website gives an indication of Cunliffe’s involvement in the slave trade. It lists 69 voyages between 1719 and 1760 in which Foster Cunliffe was an investor. Although Cunliffe did not introduce Whaley to the business, he must have been aware of the financial rewards involved through his connection with Cunliffe. 

Whaley did not begin trading in slaves until 1741, over 20 years after completing his apprenticeship. Fitting out the ships was expensive so Whaley probably needed to build enough capital by trading successfully as a grocer before entering the business. All that is known of Whaley’s business activity before his involvement in the slave trade is that he took George Bigland as an apprentice grocer in 1719 and Thomas Horsman in 1730 (10).  Whaley must have been successful in business even from the beginning of his career as Bigland’s father paid Whaley a premium of £84 [approximately £18,000 in 2026] and Horsman’s £70 [approximately £15,000 in 2026]. Apart from the data on the Slave Voyages website the only record of Whaley’s business activity is through correspondence and business records left by William Davenport (1725-1794) (11).  Davenport served an apprenticeship as a merchant under Whaley from 1741. Afterward he became Liverpool’s major slave trader in the second half of the eighteenth century (12).  This account of Whaley’s business activity is taken from Nicholas James Radburn MA thesis on William Davenport. 

Although Whaley served his apprenticeship under Foster Cunliffe, Cunliffe invested first in the slave trade in 1719, after Whaley had served his time (14).  The first record of Whaley in the Slave Voyages database is from 1741 when he invested in the Saint George which transported 148 slaves from Africa to the Caribbean (15).  This was over twenty years after he finished his apprenticeship. Over these twenty years, Whaley established himself among the senior Liverpool merchants. He was an experienced merchant after trading manufactured goods in exchange for tobacco imported from Chesapeake in North America. After dealing in luxury goods for over two decades, Whaley had the status and money to invest in the expense of fitting out a ship to carry enslaved people from Africa to the Caribbean and North America. A merchant needed to be amongst Liverpool’s elite traders to have the financial resources to invest in both fitting out a ship and to invest in importing tobacco. For example, it cost approximately £3,000 (approximately £600,000 in 2026] to purchase and fit out a 100 ton ship. In addition, the capital required to invest in importing tobacco was between £5,000 and £10,000 (£1-2 million in 2026). To be able to finance such ventures, Whaley formed partnerships with other Liverpool merchants. For example, he joined with John Knight and Edward Dean who traded as Messrs. Whaley, Knight and Dean. For most of the voyages in which he invested, Whaley was the leader or “ship’s husband”. In this role, Whaley was responsible for attracting investors, fitting out the ships, buying the cargo, instructing the ship’s captain and settling accounts and other financial matters at the end of the voyage. To have the resources and the specialist knowledge to invest in this business merchants had to be among Liverpool’s elite. It has been estimated that there were only 54 such merchants in Liverpool in 1753. Writing about a 1766 to 1774, shortly after the death of Whaley, David Richardson estimated only twenty Liverpool merchants managed 70 percent of voyages carrying enslaved people. Whaley was of a similar elite during the period 1741 to 1756 (16).  According to the Slave Voyages database, Whaley invested in thirty seven voyages, for most of which he was the lead investor. Between 1756 and 1759, he invested in three more voyages, this time with his son, Ralph, but as a minor investor. In total, he was responsible for transporting 9,355 African men, women and children to be sold into slavery of whom 1,503 or approximately 16 percent died on the journey. Fortunes could be made trading human lives, but there were also risks.

The trade in enslaving Africans enriched many merchants but this was not the case with Whaley. Foster Cunliffe, under whom Whaley served his apprenticeship, was someone who made a fortune from enslaving Africans. According to the Slave Voyages database, Cunliffe invested in 69 voyages between 1726 and his death in 1758 transporting over 19,000 Africans to be sold into slavery in the Americas. Cunliffe had been Lord Mayor of Liverpool twice in 1716 and 1717 before becoming involved in the slave trade. He became Lord Mayor for the third time in 1736. His son, Ellis Cunliffe, became one of the MPs for Liverpool in 1755. His History of Parliament profile states that he disliked his father’s business and used his ill-health as an excuse to play no active part.  However, the Slave Voyages database shows that he invested with his father between 1752 until his father’s death. When his father died in 1758, he inherited a great fortune. In 1759 he applied for then received a baronetcy. Through his sale of African into slavery, Foster Cunliffe gained a fortune that established the status of his eldest son and his ancestors.

Whaley left no such great fortune to his immediate family. He bequeathed his house in Orrell to his wife for her lifetime but no annuity or lump sum. His only monetary bequest was to his son-in-law, Ralph Garlick, who was to receive £300 (about £60,000 in 2026), a substantial sum but not a fortune. He left no money to his grandson who was also named William(18).  Radburn offered an explanation (19).  Edward Lowndes was declared bankrupt in May 1754 (20).  Lowndes was a major Liverpool merchant who led a partnership, Edward Lowndes and Company. Whaley was the major investor in Lowndes’ company and was liable for the partnership’s debts. This financially crippled Whaley. The effect is shown in his major reduction in his involvement in the slave trade. Between 1747 and 1754 he invested in between two and four voyages a year but between 1755 and 1759 he invested in only six more voyages and in only two of which he was the major investor. Considering the long period needing to prepare for a voyage, it is probable that Whaley invested in these before Lowndes’ bankruptcy. In the last three voyages, Whaley’s son Ralph was a co-investor. Whaley may have made a fortune, but Edward Lowndes’ bankruptcy drained most of that fortune, leaving Whaley with little capital, none of which was bequeathed to his immediate family. Cunliffe is an example of the great fortunes that could be made in trading Africans, but Whaley shows that such fortunes could be lost easily.

It is not known if William Whaley was born in Blackburn, but he did come from the Whalley family of Rishton, Blackburn, Sparth and Clerk-Hill. As a young man, he moved to Liverpool to serve an apprenticeship as a grocer, trading in large quantities of high-quality foodstuffs such as spices and preserved foods. His master, Foster Cunliffe became one of Liverpool’s major traders in enslaved Africans but after Whaley had served his time. After building up sufficient capital from more than 20 years as a grocer, Whaley began to invest in transporting Africans to be enslaved in the Caribbean and North America. During the middle years of the eighteenth century, he joined Cunliffe as one of Liverpool’s major investors in the slave trade. In this Whaley led the partnerships in buying the ships, fitting them out, buying the goods and settling accounts. Fortunes were made but the business came with risks. Whaley’s master was one who made a fortune, ensuring the status of his family and his ancestors after his death. Whaley did not. After the bankruptcy of Edward Lowndes, with whom Whaley was a major investor, Whaley lost most of his capital. He was unable to bequeath a fortune to his family. Whaley was connected to Blackburn, but he is probably not better known because he left no fortune. He is only remembered for his involvement in trading enslaved Africans from Liverpool.

Appendix

Voyages in which William Whaley Invested (21)

ArrivedTotal embarkedTotal disembarkedStart VoyagePlace PurchasedPlace DisembarkedEnd VoyageNotes
1741148131LiverpoolOther AfricaBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1742148131LiverpoolOther AfricaSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1743148131LiverpoolOther AfricaSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1744148131LiverpoolBight of BeninBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1744263213LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1745148131LiverpoolOther AfricaYork RiverLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1746259215LiverpoolKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1747238198LiverpoolKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
174700LiverpoolSaint-MaloCaptured by pirates or privateers - before slaves embarked.
1747240197LiverpoolOther AfricaSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1747331283Other AfricaSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1748286232LiverpoolKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1748397330LiverpoolWest Central Africa and St HelenaBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1748224184LiverpoolOther AfricaBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1749409350LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsYork RiverLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1749380316LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsJamaica, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1749273221LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsKingstonShipwrecked or destroyed, after disembarkation.
1750331283LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsSt Kitts, port unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1750233191LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1751352287LiverpoolOther AfricaJamaica, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1751222190LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1751120106LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticCharlestonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1752352287LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1752322263LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1752120103LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticYork RiverLiverpoolVoyage completed.
175211081LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticYork RiverLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1753424346LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsBarbados, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1753230197LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticVirginia, port unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1753149130LiverpoolSierra LeoneKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1753171151Senegambia and offshore AtlanticCharlestonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1754319260LiverpoolBight of Biafra and Gulf of Guinea islandsKingstonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1754171151LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticSaint John (Antigua)LiverpoolVoyage completed.
1754218187LiverpoolBarbados, place unspecifiedVoyage completed.
1754205170LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticSouth Carolina, place unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1755143133LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticCharlestonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1756352287LiverpoolBight of BeninFlorida, port unspecifiedLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1756135120LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticCharlestonLiverpoolVoyage completed.
1756269234LiverpoolBight of BeninKingstonLiverpool

Voyage completed.

Ralph Whaley invested

1758250201LiverpoolBight of BeninCharlestonLiverpool

Voyage completed.

Ralph Whaley invested.

1759117100LiverpoolSenegambia and offshore AtlanticCharlestonLiverpool

Voyage completed.

Ralph Whaley invested.

Totals93557852

 Source 'The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database', https://www.slavevoyages.org/.

Sources
 (1) ‘William Whaley’, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Whaley [accessed 20 January 2026].
 (2)  Wm Alexander Abram, History of Blackburn (Blackburn, 1877), pp.405-7.
 (3) Lancashire Archive (LA), Receipt for £236 15s 0d: William Whaley of Liverpoole, merchant, son and heir of Ralph Whaley, DDG 1/3, 7 January 1722/3.
 (4) Abram, Blackburn, p.406.
 (5) William Baldwin bequeathed his property in Blackburn to Esther and Wiliam’s son, Ralph (LA, Will of William Baldwin of Blackburn, Gentleman, WCW/Supra/C410/11, 12 August 1751).
 (6) See my article on ‘Purchase of a Moiety of the Manor of Blackburn, February 1721/2’: https://www.cottontown.org/howweusedtolive/Pages/Early-History-Of-Blackburn.aspx.
 (7) William Whaley in 1713, Britain, Country Apprentices 1710-1808 [accessed via www.findmypast.co.uk].
 (8)  LA, Will and Probate of William Whaley of Liverpool, grocer and merchant, DDHK 4/6/50, 1763.
 (9) Oxford English Dictionary, ‘Grocer’, 1, 2a.
 (10) George Bigland in 1719 and Thomas Horsman in 1730, Britain, Country Apprentices 1710-1808 [accessed via www.findmypast.co.uk].
 (11) See Earle Family Papers, Merseyside Maritime Museum, Liverpool, England; Papers Relating to the Estate of Edward Chaffers, Liverpool Record Office, Liverpool England; The Papers of William Davenport & Co. (1745-1797), Keele University Library, Staffordshire, England; William Davenport Papers, Merseyside Maritime Museum, Liverpool England. 
 (12) William Davenport in 1741 Britain, Country Apprentices 1710-1808 [accessed via www.findmypast.co.uk]; David Richardson, ‘Davenport, William [1725-1797)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004): between 1748 and 1792 he invested £120,000 (approximately £20 million) in at least 160 voyagers carrying enslaved Africans to the West Indes and North America.
 (13) Nicholas James Radburn, William Davenport, the Slave Trade, and Merchant Enterprise in Eighteenth-Century Liverpool, unpublished MA Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington (2009).
 (14) Apprenticeship usually were for seven years but Whaley’s must have been shorter because he took on his first apprentice, George Bigland, in 1719 (Britain, Country Apprentices 1710-1808 [accessed via www.findmypast.co.uk])
 (15) The first records of Whaley in the Slave Voyages database is doubtful because the Saint George is recorded three times in 1741, 1742 and 1743 transporting and landing the exact same number of slaves (see voyage numbers 90056, 90057 and 90058).
 (16) David Richardson, ‘Profits in the Liverpool Slave Trade: The Accounts of William Davenport’, Liverpool, the African Slave Trade and Abolition, Roger Anstey and Paul Hair eds. (Liverpool, 1976), p.68.
 (17) Mary M. Drummond, ‘Cunliffe, Ellis (1717-67), of Saighton Grange, nr. Chester, The History of Parliament, the House of Commons, 1754-1790, L. Namier and L. Brooks eds. (1964).
 (18) LA, Will and Probate of William Whaley of Liverpool, grocer and merchant, DDHK 4/6/50, 1763.
 (19) Radburn, William Davenport, p.25.
 (20) Aris’s Birmingham Gazette, 13 May 1754.
 (21) Source ‘The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database’, https://www.slavevoyages.org/.​​

With thanks to David Hughes, published February 2026